• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Unexplored Camping

Camping News & Reviews

  • Home

Learn

What We Can Learn from Studying Older Marathoners

At the Frankfurt Marathon last October, a 59-year-old Irishman named Tommy Hughes threw down a stunning 2:27:52. The time was a single-age world record—and when Hughes’s 34-year-old son Eoin crossed the line a few minutes later, in 2:31:30, their combined time of 4:59:22 earned them a spot in the Guinness World Records book for fastest father-son duo.

Their performances also got them into the Journal of Applied Physiology, which last month published the results of a series of physiological tests on them by a research team led by Romuald Lepers of the University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté in France, working with colleagues at the University of Toulon and Liverpool John Moores University in Britain. The data yields some insights into what makes the elder Hughes unique, and perhaps offers a note of optimism for the rest of us.

The Lab Data

The classic physiological model of marathon performance involves three parameters: VO2 max, which is basically the size of your engine; running economy, which is the efficiency of your engine; and lactate threshold, which determines what fraction of your VO2 max you can sustain over the course of 26.2 miles.

The two Hugheses are remarkably similar in VO2 max: Tommy recorded a 65.4 ml/kg/min, while Eoin came in at 66.9. Tommy’s is the more remarkable result: a typical value for a sedentary 59-year-old would be somewhere around 30. They also both have very good but not out-of-this-world running economy at marathon pace: Tommy’s was 209.6 ml/kg/km and Eoin’s 199.6. In this case, a lower number is better, meaning you’re burning less energy to maintain a given pace. Those values are typical for good marathon runners, though some top East African runners have values as low as 185.

The most interesting detail is the sustainable fraction of VO2 max. Tommy’s average marathon pace required him to be working at 91 percent of his VO2 max, while Eoin was at 85 percent. Back in 1991, when Mayo Clinic physiologist Michael Joyner was trying to calculate the theoretical limits of marathon performance, he estimated that marathon pace is typically between 75 and 85 percent of VO2 max, though he noted anecdotal reports of elite runners who were able to sustain 90 percent for a marathon.

As it happens, that very point was the subject of debate recently when researchers at the University of Delaware tested another record-setting marathoner, Gene Dykes, who ran 2:54:23 at age 70 in late 2018. Dykes’s VO2 max of 46.6 ml/kg/min suggested that he had run his entire marathon at about 95 percent of VO2 max, a seemingly preposterous conclusion that elicited a disbelieving letter to the editor in the New England Journal of Medicine.

With Hughes now also registering a value of greater than 90 percent, it may be worth considering whether one of the superpowers that distinguishes great masters marathoners is the ability to run entire marathons very close to their VO2 max. Alternatively, Lepers points out, we may simply be underestimating the true VO2 max of older runners because they have trouble reaching their absolute limits in treadmill tests to exhaustion. In support of that idea, Tommy’s lactate levels when he stepped off the treadmill at the end of the VO2 max test only reached 5.7 mmol/L, while Eoin got up to 11.5 mmol/L. Since lactate is a marker of distress from high-intensity exercise, that suggests there may be some factor—certainly not mental toughness, given his race results—that forces Tommy off the treadmill earlier than his son.

B4NeQDeHDTx

The Preparation

I omitted an important detail about Tommy Hughes: he’s not just some guy. Back in 1992, he ran a 2:13:59 marathon and represented Ireland at the Barcelona Olympics. After that high point, he took a 16-year break from running, beginning again at age 48.

These days, he reportedly trains much the same as he did in his heyday. Lepers and his colleagues used Garmin watches to track the training of both father and son for two months leading up to the Frankfurt Marathon. According to that data, Tommy averaged 112 miles per week during those months, mostly steady running with local road races as speed work. Eoin averaged 87 miles per week.

The paper also reports some other charming details. For example: “Father and son had very similar basic dietary habits. They eat porridge oats with fresh or dried fruits for breakfast, a [whole-wheat] sandwich for lunch, and potatoes or rice or pasta with vegetables and mostly chicken for dinner. The father also drinks a small glass of organic beetroot juice every day. In the last few days before the marathon, they ate plenty of pasta.”

Both men wore the Nike Vaporfly Next% in Frankfurt.

The Trajectory of Decline

Tommy’s training and racing history leaves us with a tricky dilemma. Is his amazing speed as a 59-year-old mainly a result of the fact that he’s hugely talented, as indicated by his earlier Olympic-level achievements? Clearly his training also plays a role—but is it more noteworthy that he trains extraordinarily hard now, or that he didn’t train at all between the ages of 32 and 48, potentially “saving his legs”?

It’s impossible to draw any firm conclusions from Hughes’s story alone. But his data fits into a larger picture that’s discussed in another recent paper in Sports Medicine, from an international team of researchers (including both Lepers and Joyner) led by Pedro Valenzuela of the University of Alcalá in Spain. This paper explores the role of lifelong endurance exercise as a countermeasure against age-related decline in VO2 max, which they note is a strong predictor of both how long you live and how functional you’ll be in your later years.

One of the questions they consider is how much age-related decline in VO2 max is inevitable. The conventional view is that as you get older the decline gets steeper, with a “break point” sometime after you turn 70. But if you look at people like Hughes, who continue to train hard as they age, the picture is different.

In the graph below, the solid line shows average VO2 max values for different ages according to American College of Sports Medicine reference values. The dotted lines show the 5th and 95th percentiles. (The ACSM reference values only go up to the 65 to 75 age category, so the lines beyond that are just extrapolations.) The black dots show examples of elite athletes of different ages, ranging from Oskar Svendsen’s 96.7 ml/kg/min at age 18 to French cyclist Robert Marchard’s 35 ml/kg/min at age 103. Hughes’s 65.4 at age 59 is one of the dots.

v02-max-age_h
(Photo: Courtesy Sports Medicine)

The good news: while the data is sparse, the masters athlete dots make a pretty straight-looking line. There’s no evidence that VO2 max values fall off a cliff beyond some break point. That doesn’t mean this sort of gradual linear decline comes easily. Tommy Hughes, after all, is training pretty much as hard as he did when he went to the Olympics. But it suggests that the steepest declines probably happen when you start exercising less, not simply as a result of hitting a particular age. As Valenzuela and his colleagues note, more longitudinal studies are needed, following the same people over many years, to see whether regular training can keep declines on a linear trajectory. Let’s hope Hughes provides us with some data like this: he turned 60 in January, and is aiming to rewrite the record books in his new age category.


For more Sweat Science, join me on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for the email newsletter, and check out my book Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance.

[Read More …]

Be sure to visit UnexploredPodcast.com and connect with us on social below.

Facebook – Instagram – Twitter – Pinterest – Youtube

Hear the Unexplored Podcast at any of the below…

Apple – Google – Deezer – Stitcher – Spotify – LibSyn

Camping Tips, Tricks and Adventures

We Tried Roasting Our Own Coffee. Learn from Us.

I’m a sucker for a DIY project. Exhibit A: my dining-room table, which is currently covered in a mealworm-growing operation, because my chickens love mealworms but they cost a fortune at the feed store. Exhibit B: my entire farm, which is nothing more than DIY dreams run amok. So when some lovely strangers on the internet urged me to roast my own coffee beans, I had to give it a try. This had to be simpler than running a farm, right?

Like growing mealworms, home-roasting coffee is a cost saver—at least in theory. “It’s like half the price,” says Byron Dote, the marketing manager for Sweet Maria’s, a company that sells green beans and roasting supplies. What Dote is referring to is the price of the beans, which indeed are quite a bit less expensive than their perfectly toasted counterparts. Sweet Maria’s sells 16 ounces of green beans starting at about $ 6. I currently pay $ 16 for 12 ounces of roasted beans from Verve, a roaster based in Santa Cruz, California.

However, you can gobble up potential savings pretty quickly by purchasing expensive roasting machinery. Purpose-built coffee roasters start at about $ 250 and quickly climb into the thousands. The good news is that you can begin roasting with equipment you may already own. In fact, Dote assures me, if you wanted to, you could do this on your stove with a pan and a wooden spoon.

Most home roasters start with either a hot-air popcorn popper or a stovetop popcorn maker. Since I already owned the latter, it was my method of choice. I watched a few YouTube videos, declared myself an expert, and dove right in, measuring eight ounces of green beans for my first batch.

Things went pretty well at first. 

I stirred rapidly in an attempt to ensure the beans browned evenly. Patiently, I waited for “first crack,” which is the sound the beans make when they’ve reached a light-roast status. “Coffee talks to you,” explains Dote, adding that the first and second cracks make slightly different sounds, thereby giving you an auditory signal of when you’re moving from light to medium to dark roasts. “It sounds a bit like a Twix snapping,” he says of the first crack. The next one is more like the snap, crackle, and pop of Rice Krispies.

As I hit first crack, I realized the downside of my new hobby: the smell of roasting beans is not the same scrumptious smell of freshly brewed coffee. It’s sweeter, but in a weirdly off-putting way. And it’s very strong.

I continued to stir, aiming for a medium roast. But right after first crack, my smoke detector decided it had had it with this endeavor. Roasting coffee generates smoke, and even with my stove fan going, there was enough to set off my alarm. No big deal, I thought as I pulled the batch off the stove and took it out to the porch for the final step.

Green coffee beans still have a thin skin on them. When roasted, that skin pops off. Before grinding and brewing, you need to remove this chaff. I laid a box fan on the ground and let it blow up and into a colander filled with the beans. Do not, under any circumstances, do this step indoors, because it is a mess. With a few shakes, though, I had lovely chocolate-colored beans that, after 24 hours of rest, would be ready for brewing.

I could totally do this on a regular basis, I thought.

But then I committed my fatal error: I roasted a second batch, this time taking the beans to a much darker place. My husband loves French roasts, and so I let this second attempt get to first crack, then to second, and then go a minute or so beyond. By the time we got past second crack, my smoke alarm was screaming. So were my eyes and lungs. Smoke was billowing out of the pot. I ran it outside and dumped the beans into the sieve, then had to literally run away—the smoke was that bad.

Here’s the kicker, though: it turns out, the smoke from roasting coffee contains diacetyl, a chemical compound that may cause lung disease when regularly inhaled. In fact, in 2016, the CDC published a notice warning employees at coffee roasters that they might be at risk for lung disease.  

Knowing this now, I would not roast coffee inside my house ever again. (In fact, things still smelled pretty bad in my kitchen three days later.) And I would likely not roast without wearing a mask. I also would never take a roast farther than second crack—that’s where things went from mildly to extremely unpleasant.

After I’d smoke-bombed my whole house—resulting in throwing every window open and letting 19-degree air in—I sent my editor a hasty email: “Roasting your own coffee sucks!!”

But by the next morning, I had softened my tone. Freshly roasted coffee is divine. The best way I can describe it is: extremely coffee-y. It’s not strong in the way that word usually means when applied to coffee, like it could strip paint off the walls and rip through the lining of your stomach. It’s just vibrant and flavorful.

The verdict, however, is still out on whether the effort is worth it. Maybe I’d feel differently if I had a true, purpose-built roaster that separated the chaff and minimized the smoke. However, like my efforts into home-brewing beer and making cheese, roasting coffee at home reminded me that there is a reason people pay professionals to do this—and it’s totally OK to leave things to the pros sometimes. 

A Super Bare-Bones How-To Guide to Home Roasting

Go outside: Really, learn from my mistakes. Do not do this inside. From here on out, any roasting I ever do will be on a grill.

Find a vessel: I used a popcorn pot, but you can use a pot placed over medium heat; you’ll just need to stir like crazy to keep the beans moving.

Measure: Eight ounces of beans is about all you can do in one batch. More than this won’t roast evenly.

Heat: Using medium heat, begin stirring as your pan heats up.

Listen: First crack sounds like a Twix bar or a match breaking. Second crack is a subtler crackly sound.

Remove from the heat: Personally, I’d never take a batch past second crack again, unless I had a machine helping to control the smoke.

Blow: Set a colander over a fan, and pour your beans into the colander. Turn the fan on, and stand back as the chaff blows away. Shake the colander a few times just to make sure everything is out.

Wait: Freshly roasted coffee will “off-gas” for a while after roasting. It’s best to wait 24 hours before using it.

Brew: And be happy you went through all that work. (Or not.)

[Read More …]

Be sure to visit UnexploredPodcast.com and connect with us on social below.

Facebook – Instagram – Twitter – Pinterest – Youtube

Hear the Unexplored Podcast at any of the below…

Apple – Google – Deezer – Stitcher – Spotify – LibSyn

Camping Tips, Tricks and Adventures

Primary Sidebar

YETI Rambler 14 oz Stainless Steel Vacuum Insulated Mug with Lid CLICK IMAGE TO BUY NOW!

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019

    © Copyright 2019 · Unexplored Camping · All Rights Reserved

    Privacy Policy · Terms of Service